[Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH] rhel: Add rhel8.0 data

Fabiano Fidêncio fidencio at redhat.com
Fri Nov 16 09:36:45 UTC 2018


On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:28 AM Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 04:22:19PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/powering-its-future-while-preserving-present-introducing-red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-beta
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio at redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in
> >
> > diff --git a/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in b/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..5b3648d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in
> > @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> > +<libosinfo version="0.0.1">
> > +<!-- Licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 or later.
> > +     See http://www.gnu.org/licenses/ for a copy of the license text -->
> > +  <os id="http://redhat.com/rhel/8.0">
> > +    <short-id>rhel8.0</short-id>
> > +    <_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0</_name>
> > +    <version>8.0</version>
> > +    <_vendor>Red Hat, Inc</_vendor>
> > +    <family>linux</family>
> > +    <distro>rhel</distro>
> > +    <upgrades id="http://redhat.com/rhel/7.6"/>
> > +
> > +    <release-status>prerelease</release-status>
> > +
> > +    <media arch="x86_64">
> > +      <iso>
> > +        <system-id>LINUX</system-id>
> > +        <volume-id>RHEL-8-0-BaseOS-x86_64</volume-id>
> > +      </iso>
> > +      <kernel>isolinux/vmlinuz</kernel>
> > +      <initrd>isolinux/initrd.img</initrd>
> > +    </media>
> > +
> > +    <media arch="ppc64le">
> > +      <iso>
> > +        <system-id>PPC</system-id>
> > +        <volume-id>RHEL[_-]8[_-]0[_-]BaseOS[_-]ppc64le</volume-id>
>
> Why the different volume-id for ppc64le compared to other arches? Looks
> good apart from this

That's an answer that I'd love to hear from the people producing the ISOs. :-/
For some reason PPC64LE boot ISo uses _ instead of -.

>
> Reviewed-by: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com>
>
> Christophe




More information about the Libosinfo mailing list