[Libvir] Preliminary patch to support remote driver / libvirtd
Mark McLoughlin
markmc at redhat.com
Thu Feb 1 17:02:08 UTC 2007
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 15:25 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> * Remote URLs contain either a server name or a remote transport
> * name. For example: "qemud://server.example.com/system" contains
> * a server name (server.example.com), and "qemud+unix:///system"
> * contains a transport (unix). Commonly remote URLs contain
> * both, for example: "qemud+tls://server.example.com/system"
> * (transport tls, server name server.example.com).
This makes my head hurt a bit, I think I prefer the libvirt:// even if
it means encoding URIs in URIs.
i.e. I would expect to connect to e.g. qemud:// and xend:// URIs to
using the same protocol whether the URI is local or remote.
I don't know, it's not something I really care about ... but I'd find
it strange if qemud+tls://foo.bar.com/system means "access
qemud:///system via a libvirt proxy" ...
I'm pretty sure I've seen old man DV flame people to kingdom come and
back about abusing URIs so, I guess if DV is happy, it can't be too
bad :-))
Cheers,
Mark.
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list