[Libvir] Virtual networking

[Daniel Veillard]

On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:39:13PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 06:50:47AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >   Hum, honnestly I would *really* prefer to avoid systematically going though
> > an RPC. No I don't like this idea, I prefer to keep the driver in libvirt
> > linked in the user's space. Thibgs which were dirt cheap become way more
> > expensive when they don't need to, this is a severe regression from a
> > library user standpoint.
> 
>  I'm not sure if the idea is completely wrong. I think possible
>  advantage is that the libvirt will be pretty simple library and
>  almost all development (on drivers) will be happen in the libvirtd. 

  And advantage maybe for the developper, but a definite regression for
the user, and sorry the user has priority IMHO

Daniel

-- 
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard      | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/
veillard at redhat.com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine  http://rpmfind.net/