[Libvir] [PATCH] header file changes for Solaris

[Mark Johnson]

On 6/15/07, Mark Johnson <johnson.nh at gmail.com> wrote:
> As johnlev said, I can fix the limits_iso.h with limits.h
>
>
> > <string.h> is in ISO C, but <strings.h> is not.  So as Daniel Veillard
> > said you can include the former without checks, but the latter should be
> > defended with an #ifdef HAVE_STRINGS_H.
> >
> > On BSD, <strings.h> has the legacy functions like bcopy and index.  Are
> > we using those?  Shouldn't we instead replace any instances with memcpy
> > / memmove / strchr / strrchr?
>
> It's needed because of index().
>

I guess not anymore :-)



MRJ


> > There are apparently some platforms where you can't include both ...
> > urrgh: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/1998-08/msg00317.html
>
> That can break on BSD and solaris since they have both string.h and
> strings.h which don't overlap.
>