[Libvir] Restarting of libvirt_qemud daemon

[Mark McLoughlin]

On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 04:44 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:

>   In general I really prefer restartable daemons especially if the client can
> auto restart them if they are gone missing, it makes users and sysadmins
> life so much easier (and avoid the need to start the daemon at bootup, which
> is yet another pain), though I understand this may be hard to achieve because
> we have too much state.

	Well, the problem here is that you want the daemon to start guests and
domains at boot time. That's the main reason for the initscript.

>   With respect to the unification of the various daemons, this also sounds
> like a really nice thing to have, but I must admit I'm a bit lost, I don't
> have really a clear picture of all the requirements (and probably won't until
> we finalize at least a first version of the networking support).

	Stop confusing me! :-)

	s/networking/remote/

Cheers,
Mark.