[Libvir] [RFC] Life-cycle Management of the domain take2
Richard W.M. Jones
rjones at redhat.com
Fri May 11 18:30:25 UTC 2007
Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:59:37PM +0900, Saori Fukuta wrote:
>> Thank you for your comment !
>> On Fri, 11 May 2007 13:33:57 +0100 "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>>> It sounds to me like the real solution would be to either fix
>>> virDomainGetXMLDesc to return these missing fields, or add another call
>>> to get them, or (for the password) to store it elsewhere.
>>> How about loading the original config XML and the XML from the running
>>> domain (virDomainGetXMLDesc), and then updating the config XML with only
>>> certain fields from the running domain?
>> Well, I'm not sure about the meaning of "original config XML" but I do
>> not think it is possible because the original config file might be not XML
>> like a Xen config file. Xen does not have XML file.
>> Is this right ?
> Yes I'm not sure that in general you can always hope to reconstruct the
> content of the configuration file just from a pointer to a running
OK, so the problem is two-fold then:
(1) libvirt virDomainGetXMLDesc should, if possible, return all the
fields from the original XML that was passed in virDomainDefineXML.
(2) If we just have a running instance, then perhaps not everything can
be retrieved, but virDomainGetXMLDesc ought to retrieve as much as
possible -- someone should file bugs for fields that they would like out
which could be available.
Is that right?
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in
England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3237 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the libvir-list