[Libvir] Proposal for the storage API (for discussion only)
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Fri Oct 19 12:02:29 UTC 2007
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 11:05:30AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:53:27AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>>Using structures in the public API is not in keeping with the rest of
> >>>the libvirt APIs. We should be using XML for the main metadata
> >>>description
> >>>of volumes & pools.
> >>No, that doesn't make sense. XML for an API is a hack. It's hard to
> >
> > I disagree with you. XML is perfectly suitable for descriptions,
> >especially when you need extendability and you can't control the future
> >range
> >of extensions. It's not proper for 'runtime' operations, but as a way to
> >describe complex structures I find it fills its role perfectly.
>
> These are not complex structures. It's a list of volumes, and each
> volume has 3 or 4 attributes (name, total size, free space, and a few
> flags).
They are not complex /currently/ because they are missing a lot of the
metadata we will need for a complete solution.
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list