[Daniel Veillard] Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] update from gnulib

[Daniel P. Berrange]

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 03:16:19PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Forwarding, on request:
> 
>   Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:53:43 -0400
>   From: Daniel Veillard <veillard at redhat.com>
>   To: Jim Meyering <meyering at redhat.com>
>   Cc: undisclosed-recipients: ;
>   Subject: Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] update from gnulib
>   Message-ID: <20080430085343.GF25119 at redhat.com>
>   Reply-To: veillard at redhat.com
>   References: <20080430072336.4A4D18E0038 at hormel.redhat.com>
>   In-Reply-To: <20080430072336.4A4D18E0038 at hormel.redhat.com>
>   User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-09-08)
> 
>   On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 05:57:36PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>   >
>   > Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering at redhat.com>
> 
>     Hum, to me the gnulib update side is under your control, I don't
>   feel it's necessary for you to post the patch, unless you know there
>   may be an associated change for the other developpers. Others may disagree
>   but I don't think I can really review those :-)

Yep, I agree - its fine to update gnulib and just notify the list afterwards.
There's nothing we can sensibly review in the patch, and after all, the 
whole point of gnulib is that other people have already reviewed & tested 
this for us :-)

Dan.
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|