[Libvir] Re: Fedora spec file changes
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Mon Apr 28 12:09:08 UTC 2008
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:23:09PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> First thing - libvirt.spec has previously matched the spec file we've
> used in Fedora for building packages, but now it's quite a bit out of
> My question is whether libvirt.spec should be upstream at all:
> 1) Having the two copies is confusing - which is canonical?
> 2) Keeping the two copies in sync is time consuming, especially if
> they're not going to be exactly identical.
> 3) It's not clear that it's useful to have it upstream at all - i.e.
> is it useful anywhere but Fedora? Are iscsi-initiator-utils or
> selinux-devel valid RPM names on any other distro?
We also use in the nightly builds
|: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
More information about the libvir-list