[Libvir] Re: Fedora spec file changes

Daniel P. Berrange berrange at redhat.com
Mon Apr 28 12:09:08 UTC 2008

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:23:09PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hey,
> 	First thing - libvirt.spec has previously matched the spec file we've
> used in Fedora for building packages, but now it's quite a bit out of
> sync.
> 	My question is whether libvirt.spec should be upstream at all:
>   1) Having the two copies is confusing - which is canonical?
>   2) Keeping the two copies in sync is time consuming, especially if 
>      they're not going to be exactly identical.
>   3) It's not clear that it's useful to have it upstream at all - i.e. 
>      is it useful anywhere but Fedora? Are iscsi-initiator-utils or 
>      selinux-devel valid RPM names on any other distro?

We also use in the nightly builds 

|: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

More information about the libvir-list mailing list