[Daniel Veillard] Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] update from gnulib
jim at meyering.net
Wed Apr 30 13:25:43 UTC 2008
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange at redhat.com> wrote:
> Yep, I agree - its fine to update gnulib and just notify the list afterwards.
> There's nothing we can sensibly review in the patch, and after all, the
> whole point of gnulib is that other people have already reviewed & tested
> this for us :-)
Mostly true ;-)
Last night I saw a new configure-time diagnostic that may
indicate an underlying problem -- but doesn't affect any builds
or tests I've run. I'll investigate, eventually.
More information about the libvir-list