[Libvir] [RFC] 0/3 Add Linux Container support to libvirt

Daniel P. Berrange berrange at redhat.com
Thu Feb 21 22:10:44 UTC 2008


On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 02:04:31PM -0800, Dan Smith wrote:
> DL> Right.  For a container, <init> would be the only member of <os>
> DL> as well right?  At the moment, I don't know of anything else that
> DL> we will be adding to <container>.
> 
> No, <os> contains lots of stuff, just none of it applies to a
> container :)  From the perspective of a consumer of the interface,
> there is only one block that needs to be examined.  If you put <init>
> in <container>, then I have to look at <container> (maybe) in addition
> to <os> (maybe).

I always think of '<os>' as providing data about the way your start the
virtual machine. eg, the kernel / initrd for paravirt, the BIOS boot device
for fullvirt, and thus..... the 'init' process for containers.

Oh, pretend you didn't see the '<bootloader>' tag outside the <os> block.
A historical mistake :-(

Dan.
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 




More information about the libvir-list mailing list