[Libvir] [RFC] Add Container support to libvirt

Daniel P. Berrange berrange at redhat.com
Wed Jan 16 15:08:01 UTC 2008

On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:05:19AM -0800, Dan Smith wrote:
> DL> Would init or boot make sense in this case as well?  I'm open to
> DL> changing it as long as it makes sense to everyone.
> I think that "init" is a widely-recognized term for the master process
> in a given process namespace.  I would also think that, at least from
> a libvirt perspective, most people would be interested in having an
> init-like process structure within their containers.  Thus, I would
> vote for using <init> over <boot> or <application>.

I agree - particularly as we already use <boot> elsewhere to refer to
something else.

|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 

More information about the libvir-list mailing list