[Libvir] [PATCH] lxc: handle SIGCHLD from exiting container
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Mon May 5 21:38:36 UTC 2008
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 02:33:09PM -0700, Dave Leskovec wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:38:01PM -0700, Dave Leskovec wrote:
> >> This patch allows the lxc driver to handle SIGCHLD signals from exiting
> >> containers. The handling will perform some cleanup such as waiting for
> >> the container process and killing/waiting the tty process. This is also
> >> required as a first step towards providing some kind of client container exit
> >> notification. Additional support is needed for that but this SIGCHLD handling
> >> is what would trigger the notification.
> >>
> >> libvirtd was already catching SIGCHLD although it was just ignoring it. I
> >> implemented a mechanism to distribute the signal to any other drivers in the
> >> daemon that registered a function to handle them. This required some changes to
> >> the way libvirtd was catching signals (to get the pid of the sending process) as
> >> well as an addition to the state driver structure. The intent was to provide
> >> future drivers access to signals as well.
> >
> > The reason it was ignoring it was because the QEMU driver detects the
> > shutdown of the VM without using the SIGCHLD directly. It instead detects
> > EOF on the STDOUT/ERR of the VM child process & calls waitpid() then to
> > cleanup. I notice that the LXC driver does not appear to setup any
> > STDERR/OUT for its VMs so they're still inheriting the daemon's. If it
> > isn't a huge problem it'd be desirable to try & have QEMU & LXC operate
> > in the same general way wrt to their primary child procs for VMs.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Daniel.
>
> stdout/err for the container is set to the tty. Containers can be used in a
> non-VM fashion as well. Think of a container running a daemon process or a
> container running a job as a part of a job scheduler/distribution system.
> Wouldn't it be valid in these cases for the container close stdout/err while
> continuing to run?
Hmm, yes, that could be a reasonable use case. I see the key difference
here is the the immediate child of libvirt *is* the startup application
in the container which can be anything. So yes, we can't rely on its use
of stderr/out, as we do with QEMU where the immediate child has defined
behaviour
Dan.
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list