[libvirt] Re: [PATCH 2/3] Introduce monitor 'wait' command

Anthony Liguori aliguori at us.ibm.com
Thu Apr 9 13:31:03 UTC 2009

Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hmm.  Why would you want to use -- say -- "wait 3" ?  It probably will 
> be either "loop forever" or "single event" mode in practice.  We might 
> also have a "single event, but don't block if there isn't any" mode.

Yeah, I came to the same conclusion.  We just need a wait-forever 
command.  I'll have it in the next set of patches.


Anthony Liguori

More information about the libvir-list mailing list