[libvirt] [PATCH]: don't harcode buffer for getgrnam_r
ozaki.ryota at gmail.com
Thu Apr 16 14:37:24 UTC 2009
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
<berrange at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 02:14:13PM +0200, Guido G?nther wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 09:56:27AM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 09:19:38AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > > determines the maximum needed buffersize for getgrnam_r using sysconf
>> > > instead of hardcoding it to 1024 and increases the buffer on ERANGE.
>> > > The latter is needed since sysconf is allowed to return -1. Furthermore
>> > > some glibc versions seem to return a too small buffer on amd64
>> > > (http://bugs.debian.org/520744). O.k. to apply?
>> > It looks a bit weird, using sysconf but 1/ allowing it to fail so
>> > doing the 2/ 1024 value and loop on ERANGE , but well if I understand
>> > correctly taht's forced by some glibc broken behaviour.
>> Yes, sysconf is allowed to return -1 here.
>> > My take is that the *= 2 size loop should be bounded to avoid eating
>> > all memory on some intermediate not size related error. Can we really
>> glibc shouldn't return ERANGE then, but better safe than sorry. I've
>> added that check in the attched patch.
I think it's more useful that such a function is implemented as a wrapper
function like virGetUserDirectory() in util.c, because other drivers might
use the function. Actually my patch sent just now implements
in util.c ;-)
> |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
> |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
> |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
> |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
> Libvir-list mailing list
> Libvir-list at redhat.com
More information about the libvir-list