[libvirt] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] Allow multiple monitor devices (v2)
Avi Kivity
avi at redhat.com
Thu Apr 9 14:28:02 UTC 2009
Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>> Timestamping doesn't help since the command could have been delayed
>> in the monitor socket.
>>
>> Further, we're now so deep down the complexity spiral that it has now
>> become the most complicated piece of code in the entire system.
>
> You certainly cannot believe that, can you?
It was one of my little exaggerations. But it does look
disproportionatly complicated compared to the problem we're trying to solve.
>> Surely the best way to synchronize events is to keep them on one
>> timeline?
>
> Can you show exactly how you would expect things to work in the
> monitor output? I'm having a hard time understanding what you're
> suggesting.
>
(qemu) notify enospace on
(qemu) notify vnc-connect on
(qemu)
notification: vnc connection ...
(qemu) notify migration-completion on
(qemu) migrate -d ...
notification: enospc on ide0-0
(qemu) migrate_cancel
notification: migration cancelled
(qemu) migrate -d ...
(qemu)
notification: migration completed
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list