[libvirt] Share storage using iscsi [EDIT as I cut off part]

Łukasz Mierzwa l.mierzwa at gmail.com
Fri Aug 14 17:24:50 UTC 2009


2009/8/14 Dave Allan <dallan at redhat.com>

> Łukasz Mierzwa wrote:
>
> Hi Łukasz,
>
> I will try to answer your questions inline.
>
>  Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to setup pool of machines (nodes) for virtual machines hosting
>> and I got few question about shared storage. My main requirements are:
>> 1. central management - I've got simple python app that stores information
>> about all virtual machines and all nodes, this app needs to be able to
>> manage volumes using libvirt API, so I need libvirt volume pools
>>
>
> Storage pools will let you manage iSCSI LUNs as volumes.  When you start
> the iSCSI pool, the node will login to the iSCSI target and libvirt will
> create a volume in the pool for each LUN on that target.


>  2. live migration - I got shared storage with HA, I want to use it also
>> for live migration in case one of nodes is dying or if I want to do some
>> load balancing
>>
>
> By HA you mean you have two targets presenting the same LUNs, or do you
> mean something else?
>

Yes, both targets have the same LUNs and data stored in those LUNs is
synchronized using drdb. Like described in this howto
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/HighlyAvailableiSCSITarget



>
>  Right now I'm thinking about 2 machines with disks synchronized using
>> drdb, both acting as a identical iscsi targets, iscsi HA will be provided by
>> heartbeat. So I will end up with virtual IP pointing to working iscsi
>> target, drdb should keep storage is sync. But:
>>
>> 1. I can't just use single iscsi LUN and export it as libvirt storage pool
>> to each node, because no pool type would work that way, right?
>>
>
> You could create a logical pool on the iSCSI LUN and libvirt can create and
> destroy volumes in the logical pool, which I think is what you're saying
> below.
>
>  2. http://libvirt.org/storage.html section "iSCSI volume pools" says:
>> "Volumes must be pre-allocated on the iSCSI server, and cannot be created
>> via the libvirt APIs."
>> So even if I got one LUN per node and set it as iscsi volume pool I would
>> need to create each volume on iscsi target. Libvirt can't manage volumes in
>> such pool, it can only assign already created volumes to virtual machines,
>> right?
>>
>
> What that means is that libvirt doesn't know how to tell an iSCSI array to
> create a new LUN.  You have to use whatever admin tools you use to manage
> the array to create new LUNs, but then libvirt will discover them with a
> pool refresh and you can assign them to guests.
>
>  3. So maybe my storage could be setup as LVM volume group and this lvm
>> group would be managed as libvirt lvm volume pool on master (from heartbeat
>> POV) iscsi target. I would create one logical volume per virtual machine,
>> export this volume as a separate iscsi LUN, and use this LUN as iscsi volume
>> for virtual machine.
>> To create new virtual machine I would:
>> a) create lvm volume on iscsi target using libvirt
>> b) export this volume using iscsi
>> c) define virtual machine with this volume
>> But can I create iscsi volume without pool?
>>
>
> I think I'm following you, but let me see if I can restate what you're
> saying:
>
> a) With your array's management tools, not with with libvirt, create a
> single iSCSI LUN (or several LUNs) on a target on your array.
> b) With libvirt, create an iSCSI storage pool for that iSCSI target.
> c) With libvirt, create a logical storage pool on that LUN, which creates a
> LVM group on that LUN.
> d) With libvirt, you create (and destroy) logical volumes in the LVM group
> and assign them to guests.
>
>  Does it makes any sense? Are there better ways to *manage* volumes for
>> virtual machines using iscsi?
>>
>
> And just to make sure I'm clear on what you mean by manage, you mean create
> and destroy, right?
>

Create, destroy and possibly resize (which means grow as shrinking
filesystems is complex and more dangerous) virtual machine volumes.


>
> Dave
>
>
Let me make that little more clear:
1. Lets assume I have one storage node that is acting as a iscsi target.
2. This storage node has one big block device (RAID of some kind) that will
be used for storing virtual machines volumes
3. I have multiple nodes for hosting virtual machines.
4. Each of those hosting nodes needs to be able to access every volume
stored on the storage node (for live migration) using iscsi.

I'm looking for proper way to do this. Right now I'm thinking about this
setup:
1. On the storage node I will create lvm volume group using my RAID.
2. Each virtual machine volume is created as lvm logical volume, it doesn't
matter how this volume is created (by hand, using management app or any
other way) but it always happens on the storage node. I could export whole
RAID as a single LUN, create lvm volume group on top of that, but to be able
to work with this lvm volume group from every hosting node at the same time
I would need to use clustered lvm (or something like that) and that would
add some complexity.
3. Each lvm logical volume is exported as unique LUN (also out of libvirt
scope)
4. iscsi LUNs are discovered using libvirt iscsi volume pool, and assigned
to right virtual machine.

Łukasz Mierzwa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20090814/36d3414f/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the libvir-list mailing list