[Libvirt] VNC auth per VM
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Thu Jun 11 09:52:48 UTC 2009
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:45:43AM +0200, Christian Weyermann wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange schrieb:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:10:47AM +0200, Christian Weyermann wrote:
> >
> >> Daniel P. Berrange schrieb:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 04:05:39AM -0400, Jim Paris wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 11:35:00AM +0200, Christian Weyermann wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hello everybody,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I encountered the following problem. I want my users to only be able to
> >>>>>> connect to their own virtual machines via VNC. Is there any way to do so?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> The VNC authentication setup is currently being done per-host, so there
> >>>>> is no way to define ACLs per-(user,vm) tuple as you describe.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> What about the VNC password?
> >>>> That's per-VM, isn't it?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> That is true by I don't really consider VNC password to be useful. It is
> >>> utterly insecure. If you want to have plain passwords, then its better to
> >>> use the new SASL authentication method, with its Digest-MD5 plugin. That
> >>> is still not top-grade security, but it is better then VNC password and
> >>> allows configuration of arbitrary Username+pasword pairs.. At which point
> >>> we just need ACLs against the usernames. SASL also provide Kerberos auth,
> >>> where we can do an ACL against the Kerberos principle name. And VeNCrypt
> >>> provides TLS+x509 certificates which you can either layer SASL over again,
> >>> or require client x509 certs and do an ACL against the client CNAME
> >>>
> >> Ok, so let me sumarize: It is possible to define username+password pairs
> >> via SASL. SASL can also sync with Kerberos. So the only problem left is,
> >> that there is no way to assign a specific username to a VM. So, what we
> >> need is a plugin, where we have an username and a virtual machine as
> >> input and we need to refuse the connection, if this pair is not valid.
> >> The VNC Server is part of libvirt, so the perfect method to add this
> >> functionallity would be the VNC Servers authenticate or start method.
> >>
> >> However, a Windows user is still not able to connect as there is no
> >> windows vnc client capable of doing SASL.
> >>
> >
> > GTK-VNC builds on Windows, and so does libvirt. So the intent was that
> > we'd be able to have virt-viewer working on Windows using those two.
> > Oh, when I say Windows, i mean Mingw32
> >
> Ok, so the other part of the post is correct? So what do you think about
> the effort for implementing this feature?
Well I've had the demo program from GTK-VNC working sucessfully under
Wine, and had virsh successfully working under Wine. So I see no reason
why we virt-viewer should be troublesome to get working. I hope it'll just
be a lot of silly small bugfixes/portability fixes, rather than any large
fundamental problem.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list