[netcf-devel] [libvirt] [RFC] Reporting host interface status/statistics via netcf/libvirt, and listing active vs. inactive interfaces
David Lutterkort
lutter at redhat.com
Fri Jun 19 17:47:44 UTC 2009
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 10:47 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> IMHO that results in a bad structure, because its anot associating
> the related info together, eg having an separate element to turn
> on/off IPV6, and then listing addresses:
>
> <address family='ipv6'/>
> <ip type='ipv6' address='2001:23::2' prefix='48'/>
> <ip type='ipv6' address='fe:33:55::33' prefix='64'/>
>
> vs having the direct association
>
> <address family='ipv6'>
> <ip address='2001:23::2' prefix='48'/>
> <ip address='fe:33:55::33' prefix='64'/>
> </address>
>
> the latter removes the redundancy from specifying address family in
> multiple places
Ok .. I agree that we should have a container tag like that - we should
probably call it <protocol/> though instead of <address/>
<protocol family='ipv6'>
<ip .../>
<route .../>
... other ipv6 specific settings ...
</protocol>
David
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list