[libvirt] [PATCH 6/6] Snapshot virsh implementation.

Daniel P. Berrange berrange at redhat.com
Wed Apr 7 09:43:09 UTC 2010


On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 08:00:01PM +0100, Paul Jenner wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 21:46 -0400, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> <snip>
> > @@ -8288,6 +8731,14 @@ static const vshCmdDef commands[] = {
> >      {"vcpupin", cmdVcpupin, opts_vcpupin, info_vcpupin},
> >      {"version", cmdVersion, NULL, info_version},
> >      {"vncdisplay", cmdVNCDisplay, opts_vncdisplay, info_vncdisplay},
> > +
> > +    {"snapshot-create", cmdSnapshotCreate, opts_snapshot_create, info_snapshot_create},
> > +    {"snapshot-current", cmdSnapshotCurrent, opts_snapshot_current, info_snapshot_current},
> > +    {"snapshot-delete", cmdSnapshotDelete, opts_snapshot_delete, info_snapshot_delete},
> > +    {"snapshot-dumpxml", cmdSnapshotDumpXML, opts_snapshot_dumpxml, info_snapshot_dumpxml},
> > +    {"snapshot-list", cmdSnapshotList, opts_snapshot_list, info_snapshot_list},
> > +    {"revert-to-snapshot", cmdDomainRevertToSnapshot, opts_revert_to_snapshot, info_revert_to_snapshot},
> > +
> >      {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL}
> >  };
> 
> All the new virsh commands for snapshot management follow the convention
> of snapshot- prefix (like similar pool-, vol-, net- command prefixes)
> except for revert-to-snapshot. From a virsh usability perspective, would
> it make sense to rename this command snapshot-revert? I appreciate that
> does not capture what the command does as well as revert-to-snapshot but
> I think this may be a reasonable trade-off for usability and users
> finding the command easily.

I agree, this should be called snapshot-revert

Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London    -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org        -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|




More information about the libvir-list mailing list