[libvirt] [Qemu-devel] Re: Libvirt debug API
Avi Kivity
avi at redhat.com
Mon Apr 26 14:01:02 UTC 2010
On 04/26/2010 04:43 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> The reason I lean toward the direct launch model is that it gives the
> user a lot of flexibility in terms of using things like namespaces,
> DAC, cgroups, capabilities, etc. A lot of potential features are lost
> when you do indirect launch because you have to teach the daemon how
> to support each of these features.
But what's the alternative? Teach the user how to do all these things?
It's infinitely flexible, but it's not an API you can give to a
management tool developer.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list