[libvirt] [PATCH v2 3/9] Implement cpuArchBaseline in x86 CPU driver

Daniel Veillard veillard at redhat.com
Thu Feb 11 16:25:23 UTC 2010


On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:43:53PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar at redhat.com>
> ---
>  src/cpu/cpu_x86.c |   87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c b/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c
> index a6db86d..2194c32 100644
> --- a/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c
> +++ b/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c
> @@ -137,6 +137,17 @@ x86cpuidClearBits(struct cpuX86cpuid *cpuid,
>  }
>  
>  
> +static inline void
> +x86cpuidAndBits(struct cpuX86cpuid *cpuid,
> +                const struct cpuX86cpuid *mask)
> +{
> +    cpuid->eax &= mask->eax;
> +    cpuid->ebx &= mask->ebx;
> +    cpuid->ecx &= mask->ecx;
> +    cpuid->edx &= mask->edx;
> +}
> +

  Minor point ...
Why forcing to inline and hence inflate code size and confuse
debuggers ? That doesn't sound a time critical operation, isn't it ?
True for other inlined functions in that module though ...

  ACK,

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel at veillard.com  | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/




More information about the libvir-list mailing list