[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] domain_conf.c: avoid a leak and the need for "cleanup:" block

Daniel Veillard wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 07:30:47PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> This avoids a leak and the need for a "cleanup:" block,
>> along with its three goto statements.
>> While often I prefer to write functions with a single return point,
>> this one no longer has the need, now that "addr" is freed immediately
>> after allocation.
>> Adding the semicolon in the "case..." stmt may look odd.
>> It's there because the first stmt is the declaration of "port".
>> If you'd prefer, an alternative is to put the contents of that
>> case inside a {...} block.
>   yeah, I really think a {} block is nicer in that case,
> ACK,

Ok.  I've added braces and indented.
Here's the output of git diff -B -w showing
what I'm amending into that commit:

diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
index 7815805..27f6f84 100644
--- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
+++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
@@ -4929,7 +4929,7 @@ virDomainChrDefFormat(virConnectPtr conn,

     switch (def->targetType) {
-        ; /* dummy stmt, for following declaration */
+        {
         int port = virSocketGetPort(def->target.addr);
         if (port < 0) {
             virDomainReportError(conn, VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
@@ -4947,6 +4947,7 @@ virDomainChrDefFormat(virConnectPtr conn,
                           addr, port);
+        }


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]