[libvirt] [PATCH 5/8] Add additional error reporting to virsh.

[Daniel P. Berrange]

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 06:07:30PM +0200, Matthias Bolte wrote:
> 2010/7/8 Chris Lalancette <clalance at redhat.com>:
> > With the change to make vshError() responsible for printing
> > all errors, there were some places in the code that would no
> > longer properly print errors.  The good news is that the vast
> > majority of virsh was already printing errors, so this patch
> > just cleans up the rest of the users to make them consistent.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clalance at redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/virsh.c |  228 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  1 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> The patch as is look good, but I wonder how you spot all those places
> that missed a vshError call. Did you manually go over the whole
> virsh.c file and checked all libvirt API calls?
> 
> I just spot calls to virDomainMigrate and virDomainMigrateToURI
> (around line 3040) that are not matched with a call to vshError, you
> might want to fold that into your patch.

I sounds like there should be a final catch all case. In 'main' check
the return value of 'vshCommandRun' and if it is FALSE and vshError
hasn't been invoked then report the error.

Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London    -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org        -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|