[libvirt] [PATCHv4 1/2] virsh: add new --details option to pool-list
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Wed Jun 23 08:59:02 UTC 2010
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 02:24:31PM -0400, Hugh O. Brock wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 06:54:55PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:44:57AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > On 06/21/2010 03:47 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> > > > This patch adds a new --details option to the virsh pool-list
> > > > command, making its output more useful to people who use virsh
> > > > for significant lengths of time.
> > > >
> > > > Addresses BZ # 605543
> > > >
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605543
> > > >
> > > > + /* Determine the total number of pools to list */
> > > > + numAllPools = numActivePools + numInactivePools;
> > > > + if (!numAllPools) {
> > > > + /* No pools to list, so cleanup and return */
> > > > + vshPrint(ctl, "%s\n", _("No matching pools to display"));
> > > > + return TRUE;
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > This is a change in behavior, even when the user didn't specify
> > > --details. Might it cause any backward compatibility issues in
> > > scripting, or are we okay with the change?
> >
> > Correct, we shouldn't change this behaviour - it'll break apps parsing
> > the output
>
> FWIW Rich Jones complains that the output as it stands is nigh on
> unparseable anyway. Perhaps we should consider that a bug, and fix
> it...
That's unrelated to this patch really.
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list