[libvirt] [libvirt PATCH] Port-profile ID support using IFLA_VF_PORT_PROFILE netlink msg
Stefan Berger
stefanb at us.ibm.com
Mon May 10 18:57:41 UTC 2010
libvir-list-bounces at redhat.com wrote on 05/10/2010 02:35:49 PM:
>
> Correct, IFLA_VF_PORT_PROFILE is not in the kernel yet. The kernel
patch is
> be discussed on the kernel netdev mailing list. The most recent
discussion
> is on ways to merge VDP and CDCP into what I've posted for
> IFLA_VF_PORT_PROFILE.
>
> I'll send out another libvirt patch once the kernel discussions are
final.
>
I suppose you will provide the libvirt patch only for what seems to be
Cisco technology support. Now the slight differences in technology
that we seem to try to support here are reflected in the parameters that
go into
the XML and end up in the netlink messages. Any way to consolidate that? I
suppose
VM migration between different switch vendors' switch isn't going to be
that
easy?
Stefan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20100510/45a309d2/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list