[libvirt] RFC: Supporting IPv6 on libvirt virtual networks

jclift at redhat.com jclift at redhat.com
Wed Nov 3 02:14:36 UTC 2010

On 03/11/2010, at 5:26 AM, Laine Stump <laine at laine.org> wrote:
> <ip family="ipv6" address="2001:db8:1::10" prefix="128"/>
> <ip family="ipv6" address="2001:4978:2ac::1" prefix="48">
> <radvd/>

Is "radvd" too implementation dependent?

Just thinking that as we expand out our platform support over time, if we support setting up bridges on other OS's then would radvd be what's used?   (I actually have no idea, it may very well be)

More information about the libvir-list mailing list