[libvirt] RFC: Supporting IPv6 on libvirt virtual networks

[jclift at redhat.com]

On 03/11/2010, at 5:26 AM, Laine Stump <laine at laine.org> wrote:
<snip>
> <ip family="ipv6" address="2001:db8:1::10" prefix="128"/>
> <ip family="ipv6" address="2001:4978:2ac::1" prefix="48">
> <radvd/>

Is "radvd" too implementation dependent?

Just thinking that as we expand out our platform support over time, if we support setting up bridges on other OS's then would radvd be what's used?   (I actually have no idea, it may very well be)