[libvirt] [PATCH] C#Bindings patch, rename classes

[arnaud.champion at devatom.fr]

?I just found "Error" too large for the person who will use C# bindings :S 
but... I can use Error, technically no problem.

PS : I don't know exactly the english word, by too large I just want to 
avoid confusion

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange at redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 2:21 PM
To: <arnaud.champion at devatom.fr>
Cc: <libvir-list at redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] C#Bindings patch, rename classes

> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 02:07:45PM +0200, arnaud.champion at devatom.fr 
> wrote:
>> ?Okay, I'll make the change... Currently at naming level, my problem is
>> around Error class. Do you have a suggestion ?
>
> What's wrong with following the example I gave, eg
>
>  namespace Libvirt [
>
>    public class Error {
>    ...
>
>> >
>> >IMHO
>> >
>> >namespace LibvirtBindings
>> >{
>> >    public class virDomain
>> >    {
>> >    ....
>> >
>> >Is somewhat redundant and better named
>> >
>> >namespace Libvirt
>> >{
>> >    public class Domain
>> >    {
>> >    ....
>> >
>> >
>> >The 'vir' prefix on C library APIs/structs is just a hack because C
>> >does not have any concept of namespaces. It shouldn't be copied into
>> >languages which do have proper namespace support
>> >
>
> Daniel
> -- 
> |: Red Hat, Engineering, London    -o- 
> http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
> |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- 
> http://deltacloud.org :|
> |: http://autobuild.org        -o- 
> http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
> |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 
> 9505 :|
>