[libvirt] [PATCH 1/6] Add new API virDomainStreamDisk[Info] to header and drivers
Anthony Liguori
anthony at codemonkey.ws
Fri Apr 8 19:26:48 UTC 2011
On 04/08/2011 11:02 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Daniel P. Berrange<berrange at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I have CCed Anthony and Kevin. Anthony drove the QED image streaming
> and Kevin will probably be interested in the idea of allocating raw
> images as a background activity while QEMU runs.
>
>> /*
>> * @path: fully qualified filename of the virtual disk
>> * @nregions: filled in the number of @region structs
>> * @regions: filled with a list of allocated regions
>> *
>> * Query the extents of allocated regions within the
>> * virtual disk file. The offsets in the list of regions
>> * are not guarenteed to be sorted in any explicit order.
>> */
>> int virDomainBlockGetAllocationMap(virDomainPtr dom,
>> const char *path,
>> unsigned int *nregions,
>> virDomainBlockRegionPtr *regions);
> QEMU can provide this with its existing .bdrv_is_allocated() function.
> Kevin, do you have any thoughts on whether this API will work well?
I think the trouble with this API proposal is that it's overloading
concepts.
Sparse is not the same thing as CoW to a backing file.
For instance, when you expose streaming, the result is still a sparse
file. So you'd have a rather curious API where you called to "allocate"
a region in the file which resulted in having a sparse file which you
then called again to make it non sparse. But AFAICT, the API doesn't
really tell you these details.
I think it's too much abstraction with not enough commonality.
Having to related APIs to expand a copy-on-read image and then to fill
in a sparse file is certainly a reasonable thing to do. I think trying
to make a single API that does both without having a flag that basically
makes it two APIs is going to be cumbersome.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list