[libvirt] [libvirt-php] About the inconsistency in libvirt-php

Michal Novotny minovotn at redhat.com
Mon Feb 21 14:56:51 UTC 2011


Thanks for your reply Justin.
We should definitely do something with that. I'll work on that after my 
shift finishes, maybe even tomorrow shift, since I need to concentrate 
on something else now. However we should document the naming conventions 
with functionality described. It should be written in some document as 
well. I'll take care of this.

Michal

On 02/21/2011 03:49 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 22/02/2011, at 12:32 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
> <snip>
>> libvirt_list_defined_domains() - return pointers for inactive domains, also we should consider renaming it to list_inactive_domains()
> Ouch, yeah that looks pretty non-optimal.  Probably better to fix it now, rather than leave it completely wrong. :/
>
> But... it'll need some kind of Big Warning about the problem, and the change, on the libvirt-php pages for the next release. (personal opinion)
>
> Probably something like this:
>
>    WARNING: In previous releases of libvirt-php, the function libvirt_list_defined_domains()
>             was returning the wrong kind of information.  It *should* have been showing all
>             persistent domains, both active and inactive.  However it was instead showing
>             just inactive domains.
>
>             This has now been fixed, so all persistent domains are listed.  If your PHP code
>             relies on the incorrect behaviour however, you'll need to adjust it.
>
> Maybe with some details about the new libvirt_list_inactive_domains() function too?
>
> Heh, that's just my opinion anyway. :)
>
> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Justin Clift
>
>
>


-- 
Michal Novotny<minovotn at redhat.com>, RHCE
Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat




More information about the libvir-list mailing list