[libvirt] Implementing VNC per VM access control lists

Eric Blake eblake at redhat.com
Thu Jan 6 18:42:01 UTC 2011


On 01/06/2011 11:33 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Is this something that is forward-looking (ie. once we also have an
> access layer designed, will it still make sense to keep and honor the
> qemu.conf setting), or is it enough of a hack that we should instead try
> to resolve it via the qemu:commandline approach (where we've explicitly
> documented that use of the interface is the approved way to do hacks in
> the absence of proper libvirt support)?
> 
> It's definitely a hack that would let us get to the point o

Sorry for the incomplete sentence - I rewrote my thoughts into the
earlier paragraph but failed to delete the entire first draft before
hitting send (I wasn't trying to leave you hanging for more of my thoughts).

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake at redhat.com    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 619 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20110106/49d1b8f5/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the libvir-list mailing list