[libvirt] Need a better word than "allocated" or "ascertained"
Eric Blake
eblake at redhat.com
Mon Jan 10 19:49:48 UTC 2011
On 01/10/2011 12:40 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 11/01/2011, at 12:08 AM, Zdenek Styblik wrote:
>> --- SNIP ---
>> A soft limit is enforced when host is running short on free resources or
>> during resource contention. Guest's resources are then pushed to
>> soft-limit as an attempt to regain free resources.
>> Limit is in kilobytes.
>> Applies to QEMU and LXC only.
>> --- SNIP ---
>
> Ok, how's this?
>
> http://justinclift.fedorapeople.org/virshcmdref/sect-memtune.html
>
> Workable? :)
Rather than "pushed to soft-limit", I'd say "reduced to the soft-limit".
Other than that, it looked okay to me.
--
Eric Blake eblake at redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 619 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20110110/4aba4b88/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list