[libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] SASL: Introduce session mutex

Laine Stump laine at laine.org
Mon Jul 25 18:52:56 UTC 2011

On 07/25/2011 01:04 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Some of SASL interacting functions can be called within two or more
> threads with the same pointer. Therefore we need to protect
> virNetSASLSessionPtr with mutex to avoid non-consistent states.

Looks like you and danpb had the same idea at roughly the same time. His 
patch appears more complete (you're missing a mutex on one of the 
structs), but since I'm severely sleep-deprived at the moment, I'm going 
to refrain from ACKing either one, as I may miss some problem.

Here's Dan's version (does both SASL and TLS in one go) (I'm pointing it 
out here because I've already ACKed the other patches in that same 
series, and wanted to make sure this one didn't get lost in the sea of 
other replies):


More information about the libvir-list mailing list