[libvirt] Question about PHP licencing for libvirt-php (php-libvirt for Fedora)

Michal Novotny minovotn at redhat.com
Thu Mar 10 11:12:54 UTC 2011


On 03/10/2011 12:05 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:58:25PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:31:07AM +0100, Michal Novotny wrote:
>>> On 03/10/2011 07:12 AM, Lyre wrote:
>>>> The spec was copied from Radek's original php-libvirt with the
>>>> License untouched, I'm not sure about it.
>>>>
>>> Ok Lyre, then I guess Radek wanted to stick with the PHP licence.
>>> However by naming it php-libvirt he was violating the licence
>>> because of following paragraph:
>>    Can we check with Radek if it's okay to switch to LGPLv2 ?
> I assume you actually mean  LGPLv2+  (ie the or-later variety)
>

Well, I agree that LGPLv2+ license would be better. We need to wait for 
Lyre's and Radek's reply then.

Michal

-- 
Michal Novotny<minovotn at redhat.com>, RHCE
Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat




More information about the libvir-list mailing list