[libvirt] [PATCHv4 03/15] qemu: improve efficiency of dd during snapshots
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Thu Mar 10 11:59:56 UTC 2011
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 06:45:43PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> POSIX states about dd:
>
> If the bs=expr operand is specified and no conversions other than
> sync, noerror, or notrunc are requested, the data returned from each
> input block shall be written as a separate output block; if the read
> returns less than a full block and the sync conversion is not
> specified, the resulting output block shall be the same size as the
> input block. If the bs=expr operand is not specified, or a conversion
> other than sync, noerror, or notrunc is requested, the input shall be
> processed and collected into full-sized output blocks until the end of
> the input is reached.
>
> Since we aren't using conv=sync, there is no zero-padding, but our
> use of bs= means that a short read results in a short write. If
> instead we use ibs= and obs=, then short reads are collected and dd
> only has to do a single write, which can make dd more efficient.
>
> * src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c (qemuMonitorMigrateToFile):
> Avoid 'dd bs=', since it can cause short writes.
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
ACK
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list