[libvirt] Question about PHP licencing for libvirt-php (php-libvirt for Fedora)

[Michal Novotny]

On 03/10/2011 02:19 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Michal Novotny wrote:
>> On 03/10/2011 01:26 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:03:57PM +0100, Radek Hladik wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> Well, I agree that LGPLv2+ license would be better. We need to wait for
>>>>> Lyre's and Radek's reply then.
> [snip]
>
>> I don't know what should we do but I guess having the dual-licensing
>> could be the best thing. We can't have the project name php-libvirt
>> because of the PHP license :(
> So we avoid the PHP license for our code then. Here's what we do
>
>   - Our code is licensed LGPLv2+
>   - Project is named/described  'libvirt bindings for PHP'
>   - RPM / tar.gz is named  php-libvirt  (this is in fact required by Fedora
>     RPM guidelines for php extensions)
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
OK, done. I've already commented this bugzilla and we'll see...

Thanks,
Michal

-- 
Michal Novotny<minovotn at redhat.com>, RHCE
Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat