[libvirt] [RFC, PATCH] Re: xen:/// vs. xen://FQDN/ vs xen+unix:/// discrepancy
Philipp Hahn
hahn at univention.de
Fri Mar 18 05:13:37 UTC 2011
Hello Jim,
Am Donnerstag 17 März 2011 21:11:34 schrieb Jim Fehlig:
> Philipp Hahn wrote:
> > Today I encountered the bug again: "virsh list" was not showing any
> > domain, while "virsh -c xen+unix:///" did show "Domain 0" and my other
> > domain.
>
> Are you using xen unstable or Xen 4.1 (i.e. something greater than Xen
> 4.0)?
No, this was with Xen 3.4.3.
> If so, the sysctl and domctl versions have changed, which
> essentially breaks the xen_hypervisor sub-driver. I ran into this
> problem while trying to get the libxl and xen-unified drivers to play
> nicely together - wasted a bunch of my testing time :-(. I'll send a
> patch to handle the new sysctl and domctl versions.
Good to head your XenLight work is making progress.
Sincerely
Philipp Hahn
--
Philipp Hahn Open Source Software Engineer hahn at univention.de
Univention GmbH Linux for Your Business fon: +49 421 22 232- 0
Mary-Somerville-Str.1 D-28359 Bremen fax: +49 421 22 232-99
http://www.univention.de/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20110318/84fe4c67/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list