[libvirt] [PATCH 09/14] Fix check for whether a suspend target is supported

[Daniel P. Berrange]

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:33:09AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/29/2011 08:44 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange at redhat.com>
> > 
> > hostPMFeatures is a bitmask, but the VIR_NODE_SUSPEND_TARGET
> > constants are from an enum. Thus the code was checking the
> > wrong bit values
> 
> Yep - regression introduced in patch 1/14.  Maybe you should squash this
> in to that patch, so that bisecting doesn't hit the regression (although
> that would mean patching a different file, since you moved the function
> location in the meantime).  Up to you if you want to go to the hassle.

It wasn't a regression actually. This code was still using the
duplicate enum at that point:

  enum virHostPMCapability {
     VIR_HOST_PM_S3,              /* Suspend-to-RAM */
     VIR_HOST_PM_S4,              /* Suspend-to-Disk */
     VIR_HOST_PM_HYBRID_SUSPEND,  /* Hybrid-Suspend */
 
     VIR_HOST_PM_LAST
 };

So AFAICT, it was broken from the start.


Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|