[libvirt] [PATCH] qemu: drop driver lock around sleep

Daniel P. Berrange berrange at redhat.com
Mon Nov 7 10:59:03 UTC 2011


On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 07:49:51PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> qemu/THREADS.txt is explicit that the driver lock must not be
> held for long lengths of time, as it blocks all attempts to
> manage any other vms on the same connection.  We were violating
> this by sleep()ing while waiting for a qemu child process to
> finish execution during actions such as destroy.
> 
> * src/qemu/qemu_process.h (qemuProcessKill): Alter signature.
> * src/qemu/qemu_process.c (qemuProcessKill): Add parameter.
> (qemuProcessFakeReboot, qemuProcessShutdownOrReboot)
> (qemuProcessStop): Update callers.
> * src/qemu/qemu_driver.c (qemuDomainDestroyFlags): Likewise.
> ---
> 
> Without this patch, problems in halting one domain could lock
> out actions on all other domains for more than 3 seconds, which
> is awfully long.
> 
> This doesn't solve all the problems - it is still possible to
> have a stuck NFS server being the reason for difficulties in
> stopping a domain, such as an lstat() call while attempting to
> relabel file systems, and those calls are still done while
> the driver lock is held; but I'll be submitting further patches
> as I try and reduce the critical section sizes.
> 
> I'm not sure whether this qualifies for 0.9.7 or should wait
> for post-release.
> 
>  src/qemu/qemu_driver.c  |    2 +-
>  src/qemu/qemu_process.c |   35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  src/qemu/qemu_process.h |    3 ++-
>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Post-0.9.7 IMHO, since it doesn't really fix any bug - its just an
optimization.


I think we need to take a bit of a broader look at the way we
are dealing with the driver lock. Originally we intended that
the driver lock would very rarely be held - only when resolving
a virDomainPtr into a virDomainObjPtr, and when adding/removing
virDomainObjPtr instances to/from the domain list. These days
though we seem to be holding it more & more often due to the
growth in the number of stateful objects in qemu_driver. This
is reducing the effectiveness of our per-VM locks, leading to
quite significant serialization, except when we're asleep on
QEMU monitor calls.

While adding more & more places where we lock and unlock the
driver will reduce prolonged "lock outs" due to sleeping /
slow code, it is not going to really improve our true level
of concurrency.

We need quite a radical change in driver level locking IMHO.
Take a look at the driver struct members, which is what we
are protecting here really:

struct qemud_driver {
    virMutex lock;

    virThreadPoolPtr workerPool;

    int privileged;

    uid_t user;
    gid_t group;
    int dynamicOwnership;

    unsigned int qemuVersion;
    int nextvmid;

    virCgroupPtr cgroup;
    int cgroupControllers;
    char **cgroupDeviceACL;

    virDomainObjList domains;

    brControl *brctl;
    /* These four directories are ones libvirtd uses (so must be root:root
     * to avoid security risk from QEMU processes */
    char *configDir;
    char *autostartDir;
    char *logDir;
    char *stateDir;
    /* These two directories are ones QEMU processes use (so must match
     * the QEMU user/group */
    char *libDir;
    char *cacheDir;
    char *saveDir;
    char *snapshotDir;
    char *qemuImgBinary;
    unsigned int vncAutoUnixSocket : 1;
    unsigned int vncTLS : 1;
    unsigned int vncTLSx509verify : 1;
    unsigned int vncSASL : 1;
    char *vncTLSx509certdir;
    char *vncListen;
    char *vncPassword;
    char *vncSASLdir;
    unsigned int spiceTLS : 1;
    char *spiceTLSx509certdir;
    char *spiceListen;
    char *spicePassword;
    char *hugetlbfs_mount;
    char *hugepage_path;

    unsigned int macFilter : 1;
    ebtablesContext *ebtables;
    unsigned int relaxedACS : 1;
    unsigned int vncAllowHostAudio : 1;
    unsigned int clearEmulatorCapabilities : 1;
    unsigned int allowDiskFormatProbing : 1;
    unsigned int setProcessName : 1;

    int maxProcesses;

    int max_queued;

    virCapsPtr caps;

    virDomainEventStatePtr domainEventState;

    char *securityDriverName;
    virSecurityManagerPtr securityManager;

    char *saveImageFormat;
    char *dumpImageFormat;

    char *autoDumpPath;
    bool autoDumpBypassCache;

    bool autoStartBypassCache;

    pciDeviceList *activePciHostdevs;

    virBitmapPtr reservedVNCPorts;

    virSysinfoDefPtr hostsysinfo;

    virLockManagerPluginPtr lockManager;

    /* Mapping of 'char *uuidstr' -> virConnectPtr
     * of guests which will be automatically killed
     * when the virConnectPtr is closed*/
    virHashTablePtr autodestroy;
};


Looking at those you can say

 - Some are readonly and can never change for the lifetime of libvirtd
   eg, privileged, configDir, autostartDir, stateDir, etc. We should
   not require any locking to access these.

 - Some are loaded from the config file, and while currently readonly,
   could in theory be be changed. eg vnc/spice parameters, save
   image format, etc. We could move these into a 'qemu_driver_config'
   struct and use userspace RCU to access the config readonly.

 - Some are stateful, eg  domains, activePciHostdevs, reservedVNCPorts,
   autodestroy.  We should use a separate mutex for each indivdual
   stateful object.

 - Some are callback structs to other code, eg lockManager,
   securityDriver. These separate code modules should take care of
   their own locking.

Now, wrt the 'domains' list in particular. In VM startup and shutdown,
we have always held the driver lock for the full duration. For startup
this is because, we do duplicate VM checks right at the start, but
fully setup the virDomainObjPtr until everything is running. We want
to come up with some way to ensure the 'domains' slot is held right
from the start, but without having to main the full lock all the time.
eg, reserve the slot while holding the driver lock, but everything
else runs under just the VM lock.

Similarly for shutdown, we should aim to only obtain the driver lock
at the very final stage where we remove the virDomainObjPtr from the
domains hash.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|




More information about the libvir-list mailing list