[libvirt] [PATCHv2 13/7] snapshot: implement snapshot children listing in vbox
Matthias Bolte
matthias.bolte at googlemail.com
Fri Oct 7 08:55:20 UTC 2011
2011/10/7 Eric Blake <eblake at redhat.com>:
> Adding this for VBox was a bit harder than for ESX, but the same
> principles apply for starting the traversal at a known point
> rather than covering the entire hierarchy.
>
> * src/vbox/vbox_tmpl.c (vboxCountDescendants)
> (vboxDomainSnapshotNumChildren)
> (vboxDomainSnapshotListChildrenNames): New functions.
> ---
>
> Changes in v2: avoid leaking snapshot, and fix recursive children
> names to get through loop properly by transferring initial snapshot
> into loop then skipping that element while grabbing names.
>
> Still untested from my end, but hopefully does better.
>
> src/vbox/vbox_tmpl.c | 213 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/vbox/vbox_tmpl.c b/src/vbox/vbox_tmpl.c
> index c74d2cf..84a4fca 100644
> --- a/src/vbox/vbox_tmpl.c
> +++ b/src/vbox/vbox_tmpl.c
> +static int
> +vboxDomainSnapshotListChildrenNames(virDomainSnapshotPtr snapshot,
> + char **names,
> + int nameslen,
> + unsigned int flags)
> +{
> + virDomainPtr dom = snapshot->domain;
> + VBOX_OBJECT_CHECK(dom->conn, int, -1);
> + vboxIID iid = VBOX_IID_INITIALIZER;
> + IMachine *machine = NULL;
> + ISnapshot *snap = NULL;
> + nsresult rc;
> + ISnapshot **snapshots = NULL;
> + PRUint32 count = 0;
> + int i;
> + vboxArray children = VBOX_ARRAY_INITIALIZER;
> +
> + virCheckFlags(VIR_DOMAIN_SNAPSHOT_LIST_DESCENDANTS |
> + VIR_DOMAIN_SNAPSHOT_LIST_METADATA, -1);
> +
> + vboxIIDFromUUID(&iid, dom->uuid);
> + rc = VBOX_OBJECT_GET_MACHINE(iid.value, &machine);
> + if (NS_FAILED(rc)) {
> + vboxError(VIR_ERR_NO_DOMAIN, "%s",
> + _("no domain with matching UUID"));
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> + if (!(snap = vboxDomainSnapshotGet(data, dom, machine, snapshot->name)))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + if (!nameslen || (flags & VIR_DOMAIN_SNAPSHOT_LIST_METADATA)) {
> + ret = 0;
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> + /* Over-allocates, but this is the easiest way to do things */
> + rc = machine->vtbl->GetSnapshotCount(machine, &count);
> + if (NS_FAILED(rc)) {
> + vboxError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
> + _("could not get snapshot count for domain %s"),
> + dom->name);
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> + if (VIR_ALLOC_N(snapshots, count) < 0) {
> + virReportOOMError();
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> + rc = vboxArrayGet(&children, snap, snap->vtbl->GetChildren);
> + if (NS_FAILED(rc)) {
> + vboxError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
> + "%s", _("could not get children snapshots"));
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> + if (flags & VIR_DOMAIN_SNAPSHOT_LIST_DESCENDANTS) {
> + int top = children.count;
> + int next;
> +
> + snapshots[0] = snap;
> + snap = NULL;
> + for (next = 0; next < count; next++) {
> + if (!snapshots[next])
> + break;
> + rc = vboxArrayGet(&children, snapshots[next],
> + snapshots[next]->vtbl->GetChildren);
> + if (NS_FAILED(rc)) {
> + vboxError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
> + "%s", _("could not get children snapshots"));
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> + for (i = 0; i < children.count; i++) {
> + ISnapshot *child = children.items[i];
> + if (!child)
> + continue;
> + if (top == count) {
> + vboxError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
> + _("unexpected number of snapshots > %u"), count);
> + vboxArrayRelease(&children);
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> + VBOX_ADDREF(child);
> + snapshots[top++] = child;
> + }
> + vboxArrayRelease(&children);
> + }
> + count = top - 1;
> + } else {
> + count = children.count;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nameslen; i++) {
> + PRUnichar *nameUtf16;
> + char *name;
> + int j = i + !!(flags & VIR_DOMAIN_SNAPSHOT_LIST_DESCENDANTS);
> +
> + if (i >= count)
> + break;
> +
> + rc = snapshots[j]->vtbl->GetName(snapshots[j], &nameUtf16);
Still a segfault here because snapshots[0] is NULL. Also I think this
logic is too complicated here. Are we really afraid of a stack
overflow because of a domain with many snapshots that we need to avoid
a recursive solution?
You already implemented vboxCountDescendants recursively, I'd suggest
to do the same here too.
I attached a patch to be applied on top of this one that does this and
works for me.
ACK with the attached patch applied.
--
Matthias Bolte
http://photron.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: vbox_get_snapshot_children.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 5987 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20111007/a37196cd/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list