[libvirt] [PATCH] Allow for URI aliases when connecting to libvirt
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Tue Oct 18 16:17:58 UTC 2011
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 09:24:49AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/13/2011 04:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >From: "Daniel P. Berrange"<berrange at redhat.com>
> >
> >I finally got fed up of typing URIs when using virsh....
> >
> >This adds support for a libvirt client configuration file
> >either /etc/libvirt/libvirt.conf for privileged clients,
> >or $HOME/.libvirt/libvirt.conf for unprivileged clients.
>
> Cool idea!
>
> Potential problem - our testsuite uses -c test:///default (or
> similar); there's a case where we _don't_ want to use alias lookup.
> But I guess if valid alias names cannot contain ':', then the
> presence of ':' in the target name is sufficient to prove that we
> don't want to use aliases. [This is a review as I go reply, so I'll
> see what the code actually does...]
>
> >+<h2>
> >+<a name="URI_config">Configuring URI aliases</a>
> >+</h2>
> >+
> >+<p>
> >+To simplify live for administrators, it is possible to setup URI aliases in a
>
> s/live/life/
>
> >+libvirt client configuration file. The configuration file is<code>/etc/libvirt/libvirt.conf</code>
> >+for the root user, or<code>$HOME/.libvirt/libvirt.conf</code> for any unprivileged user.
>
> Really? Shouldn't it instead be that /etc is for qemu:///system,
> and $HOME/.libvirt is for any user, _including root_, for
> qemu:///session.
The location is for the *client* application. Regardless of what
URI the client eventually connects to, the location of its config
file is the same and unrelated to the URI.
>
> >+<p>
> >+ A URI alias should be a string made up from the characters
> >+<code>a-Z, 0-9, _, -</code>. Following the<code>=</code>
> >+ can be any libvirt URI string, including arbitrary URI parameters.
> >+ URI aliases will apply to any application opening a libvirt
> >+ connection, unless it has explicitly passed the<code>VIR_CONNECT_NO_ALIASES</code>
> >+ parameter to<code>virConnectOpenAuth</code>.
>
> Should we document that aliases are not consulted if the non-NULL
> connection name includes ':'?
>
> >+++ b/include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in
> >@@ -843,7 +843,8 @@ typedef virNodeMemoryStats *virNodeMemoryStatsPtr;
> > * Flags when opening a connection to a hypervisor
> > */
> > typedef enum {
> >- VIR_CONNECT_RO = 1, /* A readonly connection */
> >+ VIR_CONNECT_RO = (1<< 0), /* A readonly connection */
> >+ VIR_CONNECT_NO_ALIASES = (1<< 1), /* Don't try to resolve URI aliases */
>
> At first glance, I didn't see a use for this bit: it seems like the
> decision to use aliases is unambiguous - if the name contains ':',
> there is no alias, and if it lacks ':', then the only way it can
> succeed is if an alias lookup is successful. Oh, I see - you use
> VIR_CONNECT_NO_ALIASES to force failure rather than attempt an alias
> lookup for the case where name has no ':'. Okay, it makes sense.
>
> >+
> >+ entry = value->list;
> >+ while (entry) {
> >+ char *offset;
> >+ size_t safe;
> >+
> >+ if (entry->type != VIR_CONF_STRING) {
> >+ virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
>
> Wouldn't VIR_ERR_CONF_SYNTAX go better here?
>
> >+ _("Expected a string for 'uri_aliases' config parameter list entry"));
> >+ return -1;
> >+ }
> >+
> >+ if (!(offset = strchr(entry->str, '='))) {
> >+ virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
>
> and here
>
> >+ _("Malformed 'uri_aliases' config entry '%s', expected 'alias=uri://host/path'"),
> >+ entry->str);
> >+ return -1;
> >+ }
> >+
> >+ safe = strspn(entry->str, "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789_-");
> >+ if (safe< (offset - entry->str)) {
> >+ virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
>
> and here
Yep, I guess we could.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list