[libvirt] [libvirt-glib] libvirt-gconfig: Move symbols introduced post 0.0.4 to the correct versions

Christophe Fergeau cfergeau at redhat.com
Wed Apr 11 11:41:38 UTC 2012


On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:25:45PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:47:46AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > Hey,
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:38:36PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:31:55PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > > > Triggered by http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667683
> > > > ---
> > > >  If this looks correct I'll have a look at libvirt-glib and
> > > > libvirt-gobject too.
> > > 
> > > Doing this would break ABI. We should just make sure future symbols
> > > are added in the right place
> > 
> > I thought that until we decide we'll attempt to be ABI stable, we'd be
> > raising the symbols version number before every release if there has been
> > any new symbols, thus breaking ABI. It seems this hasn't been done in a
> > while :-/
> 
> So what about the attached patch. 0.0.8 didn't introduce new symbols yet
> so I went for 0.0.7.

I'd go for 0.0.8 since I hope to get my usb redir patch series which adds
new libvirt-gconfig symbols, and this way we won't forget to raise this
number ;) Or I can add a patch going from 0.0.7 to 0.0.8 in the series.

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20120411/57de703b/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the libvir-list mailing list