[libvirt] Start of freeze for libvirt-0.9.11 and availability of rc1

[Guido Günther]

Hi Laine,
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 08:27:39PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:22:56AM +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On Tuesday 27 March 2012 18:30:17 Guido Günther wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:32:23AM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > > >   As scheduled, we are entering the freeze for 0.9.11.
> > ...
> > > >  Please give it a try ! Stability and portability feedback are really
> > > > welcome as we didn't had a release in Feb and the risk of having
> > > > something messed up is slightly higher than usual !
> > >
> > > Looks good so far on Debian's autobuilders:
> > >
> > > 	https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libvirt&suite=experimental
> > 
> > Compiling 0.9.11-rc on a Debian-Squeeze (EGLIBC 2.11.3-2, Kernel 2.6.32-52, 
> > gcc 4.4.5-8.) fails with
> >   CC     libvirt_util_la-virnetdevbandwidth.lo
> > util/virnetdev.c:1220: error: 'IFLA_VF_MAX' undeclared here (not in a 
> > function)
> > 
> > The following patch fixes that for me:
> > --- a/src/util/virnetdev.c
> > +++ b/src/util/virnetdev.c
> > @@ -1215,7 +1215,7 @@ virNetDevGetVirtualFunctionInfo(const char *vfname 
> > ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> >      return -1;
> >  }
> >  #endif /* !__linux__ */
> > -#if defined(__linux__) && defined(HAVE_LIBNL)
> > +#if defined(__linux__) && defined(HAVE_LIBNL) && defined(IFLA_VF_MAX)
> 
> This looks reasonable to me since this isn't available in Debian
> Squeeze's kernel headers and I don't think it's worth a separate
> configure check since we'd only check for IFLA_VF_MAX there.

Can I go ahead and push this change?
Cheers,
 -- Guido