[libvirt] [PATCH libvirt-glib] gobject: add GVir.DomainShutdownFlags binding
Marc-André Lureau
marcandre.lureau at gmail.com
Fri Aug 3 10:44:10 UTC 2012
Hey
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 07:36:50PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>> ---
>> libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-domain.c | 2 +-
>> libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-domain.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>> libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject.sym | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-domain.c b/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-domain.c
>> index ba8e12b..d12ac97 100644
>> --- a/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-domain.c
>> +++ b/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-domain.c
>> @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ gboolean gvir_domain_delete(GVirDomain *dom,
>> /**
>> * gvir_domain_shutdown:
>> * @dom: the domain
>> - * @flags: the flags
>> + * @flags: the %GVirDomainShutdownFlags flags
>> */
>> gboolean gvir_domain_shutdown(GVirDomain *dom,
>> guint flags G_GNUC_UNUSED,
>> diff --git a/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-domain.h b/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-domain.h
>> index 70e7e37..c61a2f5 100644
>> --- a/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-domain.h
>> +++ b/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-domain.h
>> @@ -116,6 +116,19 @@ typedef enum {
>> GVIR_DOMAIN_XML_UPDATE_CPU = VIR_DOMAIN_XML_UPDATE_CPU,
>> } GVirDomainXMLFlags;
>>
>> +/**
>> + * GVirDomainShutdownFlags:
>> + * @GVIR_DOMAIN_SHUTDOWN_NONE: No flags, hypervisor choice
>> + * @GVIR_DOMAIN_SHUTDOWN_ACPI_POWER_BTN: Send ACPI event
>> + * @GVIR_DOMAIN_SHUTDOWN_GUEST_AGENT: Use guest agent
>> + *
>> + */
>> +typedef enum {
>> + GVIR_DOMAIN_SHUTDOWN_NONE = 0,
>
> I was looking again at this patch, and I was wondering why it's not doing
> this instead of using SHUTDOWN_NONE:
The counterpart GVirDomainStartFlags uses _NONE. Is this a "flawed" in
libvirt API? Do we prefer to copy libvirt or do we want consitancy? I
prefer constitancy.
However, DEFAULT was perhaps a better name than NONE for default behaviour.
I would suggest with your patch we add START_DEFAULT, (but keep
START_NONE), for consistancy.
Daniel should now what feels right, so I will follow his opinion
--
Marc-André Lureau
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list