[libvirt] [PATCH 0/9] network: properly support openvswitch in <network>

[Laine Stump]

On 08/08/2012 03:43 PM, Ansis Atteka wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Laine Stump <laine at laine.org
> <mailto:laine at laine.org>> wrote:
>
>     Although it's been possible (ever since openvswitch was added to
>     libvirt in 0.9.11) for a libvirt network to use an openvswitch bridge
>     (by adding <virtualport type='openvswitch'>), the virtualport in the
>     network would always have a default random interfaceid included, which
>     would be re-used for all interfaces using that network, which doesn't
>     really work at all. The alternative was to not specify openvswitch in
>     the <network> definition, but to do it in the guest's <interface>
>     definition instead - this of course goes against the principle of not
>     having host-specific config embedded in guest config.
>
>     This patch series enhances the functionality of <virtualport>
>     elements, to allow omitting some attributes (and even the type), and
>     to merge the interface, network, and portgroup virtualports rather
>     than simply picking one. This not only makes openvswitch <network>s
>     more practical (because the network can specify type='openvswitch'
>     without also specifying an interfaceid), but also makes <virtualport>
>     in networks and portgroups more useful in general - for example, an
>     interface can specify an interfaceid (used only by openvswitch) *and*
>     an instanceid (used only by 802.1Qbh), while the network's virtualport
>     specifies only the type, and the portgroups specify the managerid,
>     typeid, profileid, or whatever is appropriate for the type of switch
>     used by the network.
>
>     The result is that the guest config can be completely devoid of
>     knowledge about the type of switch being used on the hardware, but can
>     still enjoy full configurability for whatever switch ends up being
>     used.
>
> If I understand correctly, then these patch series should enable
> following configuration to work:
>
> The domain XML:
> ...
>     <interface type='network'>
>       <mac address='52:54:00:25:0c:bb'/>
>       <source network='ovsnet'/>
>       <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03'
> function='0x0'/>
>     </interface>
> ...
>
> The network XML:
> <network>
>   <name>ovsnet</name>
>   <uuid>ad68ae68-ee26-5c65-8cff-e6c182ff3593</uuid>
>   <bridge name='ovs'/>
>   <forward mode='bridge'/>
>   <mac address='52:54:00:44:A4:D8'/>
>   <virtualport type='openvswitch'/>
> </network>
>
>
> And then I would expect that libvirt would auto generate the
> interface IDs for each interface that gets added to this ovsnet
> network,

That was (at some point anyway) my intent - if the interface has an
interface id use it, if not then generate one, but...

> but instead I am seeing the following error:
>
> 2012-08-08 19:22:16.149+0000: 10840: error :
> virNetDevVPortProfileCheckComplete:165 : XML error: missing
> interfaceid in <virtualport type='openvswitch'>

Urg. In the end I forgot that part, so when it checks for completeness,
it fails. I'll make a patch to fix that.

Thanks for catching that bug.

(one issue about this - since it's not known until runtime that the
network is ovs, the interfaceid won't be generated until then, and at
that time it's not reasonable to update the interfaceid in the guest's
persistent config. So, if you're configured this way, the guest will get
a different new interfaceid every time it is restarted.)

>
> I guess, it would be desirable to auto-generate interface
> IDs, if the network was of type openvswitch? Otherwise
> domain XML still needs to know what kind of type is
> the underlying bridge in the network XML.

Agreed. It's okay if it *optionally* puts in that info (just in case the
network is ovs), but it shouldn't require it.

>
> Though, how would this work in Actual Config, once the
> network type gets switched back from OVS to Linux
> Bridge? Would the interface ID be automatically removed
> from all relevant Domain XMLs?

Kind of. More exactly, the interface ID would be ignored when not
relevant. Similarly, you could also have an instanceid (used by
802.1Qbg), and if the actual network type was ovs, the instanceid would
be ignored. The only thing you *can't* do is to specify <virtualport
type='xyz'> in the interface if the network is actually some other type.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20120808/99892388/attachment-0001.htm>