[libvirt] [jenkins at libvirt.sigxcpu.org: Build failed in Jenkins: libvirt-check #419]

[Daniel P. Berrange]

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 09:43:52PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:04:38AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 09:59:45AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:50:42AM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > it seems one of these commits
> > > > 
> > > > 5411e7e176dcbb65591cb97ec128b5fd0f365805
> > > > 473011334ccd93e8efbb67f2561f1d4e54d212ae
> > > > 392c192240566d9e167d2b5a1022092d8f7e045c
> > > > 
> > > > broke "make check" as seen on
> > > > 
> > > > 	http://honk.sigxcpu.org:8001/job/libvirt-check/417/console
> > > > 
> > > > output attached. I can't look into this in more right now though.
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >  -- Guido
> > > 
> > > Thanks, I'll figure this out & provide patches.  I rather screwed up the
> > > testing of the virArch patches due to a nunber of mistakes on my dev
> > > machine :-(
> > 
> > With the fixes I just pushed, I hope this should be working now.
> > I tested with everything configure option except AppArmor enabled
> > now.
> All back to green. Thanks a lot! I wonder if it would make sense to
> automatically forward "make and make check" failures to this or rather a
> special list?

Assuming it is reliable (ie not generating too many false reports), then
there's no reason we can't have it sending straight to this list.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|