[libvirt] [PATCH v3 0/5] RFC: grant KVM guests retain arbitrary capabilities

[Taku Izumi]

On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:01:35 +0100
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> wrote:

 Thank you for your comment.

> On 01/20/2012 07:25 AM, Taku Izumi wrote:
> >   OK. I'll try to implement like this way.
> 
> No, I think your current patch is fine.  Perhaps in the future we can 
> try to implement cgroup-based whitelists in the kernel.
> 
> In any case adding rawio (which is a per-process capability) to a <disk> 
> element would be wrong.

  It is true that process capability affects not per disk but a domain.
  It's a bit strange, but it is OK in my personal opinion.

  Which do you think is better, Eric?

-- 
Taku Izumi <izumi.taku at jp.fujitsu.com>