[libvirt] [PATCHv3] docs: Improve patch submission guidelines

[Michal Privoznik]

We should really advise (new) developers to send rebased patches
that apply cleanly and use git-send-email rather than all other
obscure ways.
---
diff to v2:
-Eric's suggestions worked in

 HACKING              |   37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 docs/hacking.html.in |   49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/HACKING b/HACKING
index 69ea96b..d960992 100644
--- a/HACKING
+++ b/HACKING
@@ -21,9 +21,44 @@ or:
 
   git diff > libvirt-myfeature.patch
 
+However, the usual workflow of libvirt developer is:
+
+  git checkout master
+  git pull
+  git checkout -t origin -b workbranch
+  Hack, committing any changes along the way
+
+Then, when you want to post your patches:
+
+  git pull --rebase
+  (fix any conflicts)
+  git send-email --cover-letter --no-chain-reply-to --annotate --to=libvir-list at redhat.com master
+
+For a single patch you can omit "--cover-letter", but series of a two or more
+patches needs a cover letter. If you get tired of typing
+"--to=libvir-list at redhat.com" designation you can set it in git config:
+
+  git config sendemail.to libvir-list at redhat.com
+
+Please follow this as close as you can, especially the rebase and git
+send-email part, as it makes life easier for other developers to review your
+patch set. One should avoid sending patches as attachments, but rather send
+them in email body among with commit message. If a developer is sending
+another version of the patch (e.g. to address review comments), he is advised
+to note differences to previous versions after the "---" line in the patch so
+that it helps reviewers but doesn't become part of git history. Moreover, such
+patch needs to be prefixed correctly with "--subject-prefix=PATCHv2" appended
+to "git send-email" (substitute "v2" with the correct version if needed
+though).
+
 (3) Split large changes into a series of smaller patches, self-contained if
 possible, with an explanation of each patch and an explanation of how the
-sequence of patches fits together.
+sequence of patches fits together. Moreover, please keep in mind that it's
+required to be able to compile cleanly after each patch. A feature does not
+have to work until the end of a series, as long as intermediate patches don't
+cause test-suite failures.
+
+
 
 (4) Make sure your patches apply against libvirt GIT. Developers only follow GIT
 and don't care much about released versions.
diff --git a/docs/hacking.html.in b/docs/hacking.html.in
index 89f9980..96cc062 100644
--- a/docs/hacking.html.in
+++ b/docs/hacking.html.in
@@ -11,19 +11,58 @@
 
       <li><p>Post patches in unified diff format.  A command similar to this
         should work:</p>
-<pre>
+<del><pre>
   diff -urp libvirt.orig/ libvirt.modified/ > libvirt-myfeature.patch
-</pre>
+</pre></del>
         <p>
           or:
         </p>
 <pre>
   git diff > libvirt-myfeature.patch
 </pre>
+        <p>However, the usual workflow of libvirt developer is:</p>
+<pre>
+  git checkout master
+  git pull
+  git checkout -t origin -b workbranch
+  Hack, committing any changes along the way
+</pre>
+        <p>Then, when you want to post your patches:</p>
+<pre>
+  git pull --rebase
+  (fix any conflicts)
+  git send-email --cover-letter --no-chain-reply-to --annotate --to=libvir-list at redhat.com master
+</pre>
+        <p>For a single patch you can omit <code>--cover-letter</code>, but
+        series of a two or more patches needs a cover letter. If you get tired
+        of typing <code>--to=libvir-list at redhat.com</code> designation you can
+        set it in git config:</p>
+<pre>
+  git config sendemail.to libvir-list at redhat.com
+</pre>
+        <p>Please follow this as close as you can, especially the rebase and
+        git send-email part, as it makes life easier for other developers to
+        review your patch set. One should avoid sending patches as attachments,
+        but rather send them in email body among with commit message. If a
+        developer is sending another version of the patch (e.g. to address
+        review comments), he is advised to note differences to previous
+        versions after the <code>---</code> line in the patch so that it helps
+        reviewers but doesn't become part of git history. Moreover, such patch
+        needs to be prefixed correctly with
+        <code>--subject-prefix=PATCHv2</code> appended to <code>git
+            send-email</code> (substitute <code>v2</code> with the correct
+        version if needed though).</p>
       </li>
-      <li>Split large changes into a series of smaller patches, self-contained
-        if possible, with an explanation of each patch and an explanation of how
-        the sequence of patches fits together.</li>
+
+      <li><p>Split large changes into a series of smaller patches,
+        self-contained if possible, with an explanation of each patch and an
+        explanation of how the sequence of patches fits together. Moreover,
+        please keep in mind that it's required to be able to compile cleanly
+        after each patch.  A feature does not have to work until the end of a
+        series, as long as intermediate patches don't cause test-suite
+        failures.</p>
+      </li>
+
       <li>Make sure your patches apply against libvirt GIT.  Developers
         only follow GIT and don't care much about released versions.</li>
       <li><p>Run the automated tests on your code before submitting any changes.
-- 
1.7.8.6