[libvirt] [PATCH] Added timestamps to storage volumes

Hendrik Schwartke hendrik at os-t.de
Fri Jul 20 07:17:54 UTC 2012

On 19.07.2012 16:08, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/19/2012 01:13 AM, Hendrik Schwartke wrote:
>> I reconsidered the way timestamps are represented. I think that an event
>> at 100.91 happened before 100.200 is misleading.
> Yep, definite bug - you have to zero-pad the subsecond resolution, and
> also consider whether to strip trailing zeros.
>> So I changed that.
>> Furthermore I would appreciate if the timestamps are available in
>> 0.10.0, so I splitted the patch. The first patch doesn't use stat-time
>> and the second patches the first and does use stat-time.
> Not necessary to do two implementations.  stat-time has now been
> relicensed in gnulib, so all we are waiting on now is for updated
> automake to hit Fedora 17 (it has already hit rawhide):
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838660
Wow, that was fast. Many thanks for your help.

> Given the security bug in current automake, I will actively protest
> releasing the next version of libvirt until fixed automake is available.
> Don't worry - I plan to include this feature in the next libvirt build;
> just a few more days of waiting.

More information about the libvir-list mailing list