[libvirt] libvirt_tck autotest wrapper looks good, commited
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Fri Mar 9 08:49:51 UTC 2012
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:28:47PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:33:48PM +0800, Guannan Ren wrote:
> > On 03/09/2012 01:40 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> > >Thanks Guannan:
> > >
> > >https://github.com/autotest/autotest/commit/ba4b748e7b9a9bfe7898a97cdccdc9b867d5321c
> > >
> > >
> > >Cheers,
> > >
> > >Lucas
> >
> > That's great, thank Lucas.
>
> yes excellent to both of you :-) yay !!!
>
> > This is the initial version, we need to maintain it later on.
> > If that, the patch will be sent to autotest mainling list, is
> > that right?
>
> Yes I would think that's the normal place (for now).
> The very first thing I would suggest is to get a new TCK release as
> the one referenced is realy ancient :
> -rw-r--r-- 1 berrange www 40996 Jul 22 2009 Sys-Virt-TCK-0.1.0.tar.gz
> We should try to iron out possible issues when running the TCK from
> autotest, then make a new release, put it on ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/tck/
> and update the upstream autotest with it.
Yes, my bad. We should fix libvirt and/or the TCK so that it passes,
and then cut a new release.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list